| NONIS , NO RUSH FOR A TRADE, canucks are good to go next year |
| Author |
Message |
Marcel_Hossa81
Senior Member
   
Posts: 262
Group: Registered +
Joined: Jul 2007
Status:
Offline
Reputation:
QNHL$:250
|
|
NONIS , NO RUSH FOR A TRADE, canucks are good to go next year
Of all the rumors around to bring in more scoring for canucks, or trade away your best d-men like Ohlund, Mitchell is non-sense.
The Canucks are good to go for now, they wouldn't need an major upgrade ( if there no good deals coming), they can start the season as it is.
Their roster a good, don't you think???? come on, why need so much changes....the chemistry are still great...remember after X-mas last year went ?????
Sedin - Sedin - Pyatt
Naslund - Morrison - Isbister
Cooke - Kesler - Linden
Cowan - Ritchie - Burrows
youngsters they have: Hansen, Shannon, Bourdon, Edler that can play well !
who say the canucks can't win games like this ??? think about last year? do you see any long winning streak came in last year?? i mean yes, the Ducks are killer, but they're best team last year....that's why the Canucks lost.
The Canucks will try to bring in ( whether a trade or through UFA ) is Center man, or a winger to play with Naslund that's all. if there deals that are not work out well, then " who cares" Canucks can win games as it is for now.
Bring in big names, doesn't mean big results.....experiences, chemistry, team work , that's you need to win...and that's the Canucks last year ! and will be much better next season.... addition of Miller will improve the Defences.....when the team with ONE OF THE BEST GOALIE in the league, strong Defensive lines, then every one up-front can concentrate to put the puck in the net !
take it or not ! i believe the Canucks next year !
______________________________________________________
drop the Vancouver Trade rumors sjjrsharks
|
|
| 07-24-2007 04:01 PM |
|

|
tkaine
Shark out of water
   
Posts: 507
Group: Registered +
Joined: Jul 2006
Status:
Offline
Reputation:
QNHL$:646
|
|
RE: NONIS , NO RUSH FOR A TRADE, canucks are good to go next year
Yeah, they could win games like that. But they wouldn't be a playoff team.
Luongo is practically that whole team. But if they can't score a goal then having their goalie buy them all the triple-overtimes in the world still won't help them.
They need scoring forwards, and what they have in that department is sub-par.
And could you imagine the 'Nucks if Luongo was injured? They would be struggling just to stay out of last place.
ChompBoard.com - San Jose Sharks Fan Forums & Message Boards & more

|
|
| 07-24-2007 04:09 PM |
|
 |
Marcel_Hossa81
Senior Member
   
Posts: 262
Group: Registered +
Joined: Jul 2007
Status:
Offline
Reputation:
QNHL$:250
|
|
RE: NONIS , NO RUSH FOR A TRADE, canucks are good to go next year
yea especially with sanford as the back up but i have faith that luongo won't get injured
|
|
| 07-24-2007 04:12 PM |
|
 |
sjjrsharks
Junior Member
 
Posts: 9
Group: Registered
Joined: Jul 2007
Status:
Offline
Reputation:
QNHL$:10
|
|
RE: NONIS , NO RUSH FOR A TRADE, canucks are good to go next year
yea...they need help on offense... the best defense is offense...also maybe pick up belfour for a year as insurance
This post was last modified: 07-24-2007 04:15 PM by sjjrsharks.
|
|
| 07-24-2007 04:13 PM |
|
 |
Marcel_Hossa81
Senior Member
   
Posts: 262
Group: Registered +
Joined: Jul 2007
Status:
Offline
Reputation:
QNHL$:250
|
|
RE: NONIS , NO RUSH FOR A TRADE, canucks are good to go next year
if anything it will be sanford who will get injured because he's injure prone
|
|
| 07-24-2007 04:14 PM |
|
 |
canucks79
Super Moderator
     
Posts: 1,520
Group: Super Moderators
Joined: Aug 2006
Status:
Offline
Reputation:  
QNHL$:1,112
|
|
RE: NONIS , NO RUSH FOR A TRADE, canucks are good to go next year
Isbister playing with Naslund and Morrison yeah right!!!
If any one is playing with Morrison its Cooke. Now where will Naslund fall in? I can see the same line as last year that did really well: Cooke- Morrison - Cowan.
[
R.I.P. Luc Bourdon, You are always a Canuck.
I WAS BORN A CANUCKS FAN, AND I'LL DIE A CANUCKS FAN!
|
|
| 07-24-2007 05:57 PM |
|

|
tkaine
Shark out of water
   
Posts: 507
Group: Registered +
Joined: Jul 2006
Status:
Offline
Reputation:
QNHL$:646
|
|
RE: NONIS , NO RUSH FOR A TRADE, canucks are good to go next year
Even if Luongo stays healthy it would be a one-man team.
The Canucks were just plain lucky to do as well as they did last year.
Without changes, the same team could easily miss the playoffs entirely this year.
ChompBoard.com - San Jose Sharks Fan Forums & Message Boards & more

This post was last modified: 07-24-2007 05:58 PM by tkaine.
|
|
| 07-24-2007 05:57 PM |
|
 |
Danimal
Posting Freak
    
Posts: 1,035
Group: Registered +
Joined: Sep 2006
Status:
Offline
Reputation:
QNHL$:216
|
|
RE: NONIS , NO RUSH FOR A TRADE, canucks are good to go next year
Last year people didn't think that they would make the playoffs. They have some guys that can score and the best goalie in the West they will make the playoffs again this year.
Of course it would be tough if Luongo went down but pretty much every team whose goalie gets injured is in trouble.
|
|
| 07-24-2007 06:24 PM |
|
 |
Marcel_Hossa81
Senior Member
   
Posts: 262
Group: Registered +
Joined: Jul 2007
Status:
Offline
Reputation:
QNHL$:250
|
|
RE: NONIS , NO RUSH FOR A TRADE, canucks are good to go next year
except toronto this year if toskala gets injured its up to raycroft who is sub par good
|
|
| 07-24-2007 06:26 PM |
|
 |
Daniel_Canuck
Junior Member
 
Posts: 17
Group: Registered
Joined: Jul 2007
Status:
Offline
Reputation:
QNHL$:21
|
|
RE: NONIS , NO RUSH FOR A TRADE, canucks are good to go next year
I agree with you to some extent but we do need to improve (I want J.P. Dumont. I know, I'll keep dreaming)

Nonis get J.P. Dumont
|
|
| 07-28-2007 11:00 PM |
|
 |